Geophysics at Mellor
Geophysical survey has formed a crucial part of the evaluation programme, particularly with regard to the Iron Age features, where circular anomalies in the field below the Church car park led to the excavation of Trench 15.
Philip Day, 1937-2009
Click on large image to left to play short video interview
The extensive geophysical survey has been carried out using a variety of methods:
Much of it would not have been possible without the invaluable work of Philip Day,
Serving on the management Committee as scientific adviser to the Trust, Philip used his professional skill as an anlytical chemist to carry out spectroscopic, X-ray and microscopic studies in the examination of the archaeological finds.
In addition he devoted a large part of his retirement to teaching himself and many others the techniques of geophysical investigation, his last success was finding an anomaly in a Knowle Farm field, which excavtion showed to be an 18th century lime kiln.
He touched so many people with his gentle charm, bravery through his illness
and wealth of knowledge and experience which he was always ready to share.
He will be very greatly missed
has proved particularly successful in identifying the location and path of the outer enclosure ditch in Area B. This is largely due to the size of the feature and the high differential in resistance between the earth filled ditch and the bedrock geology. Within the area of boulder clay the difference between the natural geology and the fill of the archaeological features is less pronounced, giving less conclusive and more difficult to interpret results.
has also been used extensively and proved successful in identifying large features. In addition it has also been able to locate features cut into the boulder clay, where the fills contain a high percentage of burnt material. particular examples include the charcoal rich fills of the gullies found within Trench 16 in area A.
Ground Penetrating Radar(GPR)
has been used where Resistivity and Magnetometry could not be deployed, such as on the road,
drive and paved areas. One particularly interesting result leads us to believe that the northern arm of the inner enclosure may run beneath the moderndriveway of the Old Vicarage.
These surveys have been invaluable in guiding the excavation. The most notable example of this was the recognition of an anomaly close to the front of the Old Vicarage gate, which led to the excavation of Trench 18 and the uncovering of a magnificent section of the Deep Defensive Inner Ditch.
Other results have been misleading, however. Circular anomalies in the field led to the excavation of Trench 15, but instead of the expected Hut Circles, excavation revealed purely geological anomalies. This illustrates well how geophysical investigation is able to pick out the differences or
anomalies in the sub structure, but that traditional excavation is needed for clear identification.